June 5, 2007

· Sociology · Teaching

Despite being a contributor to this OrgTheory blog, my dirty little secret is that this past semester was the first time I ever taught a Sociology of Organizations course. Shocking, I know. It went OK for a first-time effort. Quantitatively my ratings were a bit below my average, but not worryingly so. Today, though, I got back the specific (anonymous) comments of the students, which always make for interesting reading. I broadly subscribe to Fabio’s view that evaluations are pretty informative. To see ourselves as others see us, etc. Arizona asks for freeform comments on two questions: What did you especially like about this course? And, What suggestions would you make to improve this course? Past highlights (from my Social Theory course) include, “No more tucked-in shirts without a belt” and “This course would be better if it wasn’t required.” As expected, the comments from the Orgs course cover a range. Some of the better ones:

Edifying: “Instructor knows his shit.” Woo, I am down with the kids. “Actually interesting!”

Possibly misguided: “[Please provide] More suggestions for my own life with regard to my business decisions.”

Praise or not?: “Professor was ironic.” “[I liked] the ability of the instructor to make a not so interesting subject somewhat interesting.” “The teacher had his own way of teaching.”

Campus identity politics scandal narrowly avoided: “Don’t insult the Scottish. We may not have preserved the written word during the Dark Ages but we are a proud people none the less.”

All Categories


I am Professor of Sociology at Duke University. I’m affiliated with the Kenan Institute for Ethics, the Markets and Management Studies program, and the Duke Network Analysis Center. Learn more.



To be notified of updates, you can subscribe to the  RSS feed for the site.